Malik Willis
QB · Starting quarterback
30 attempts · 7 rushes
214 pass yds · 1.3 pass TD · 39 rush yds
Efficient 2025 spot duty, expanded to a new full-time role
A current-week Dolphins projection board, explainable model insights, and the franchise's notable fantasy seasons across Standard, Half-PPR, and PPR scoring.
Week 1 outlook
Point estimates for at Las Vegas Raiders on Sep 13. These rank Miami players only, not the full NFL player pool.
Roles checked against the September 8 roster and official depth chart. Week 1 game-status designations are not yet available in the structured feed.
QB · Starting quarterback
30 attempts · 7 rushes
214 pass yds · 1.3 pass TD · 39 rush yds
Efficient 2025 spot duty, expanded to a new full-time role
RB · Offensive centerpiece
15 carries · 5 targets
78 rush yds · 4.2 rec · 32 rec yds
2025 production and a featured role on the September 7 roster
WR · Movement receiver
6 targets · 1 designed run
8 rush yds · 4.1 rec · 49 rec yds
2025's 65 targets plus a larger post-Waddle opportunity
WR · Boundary receiver
6 targets
3.8 rec · 52 rec yds
Veteran role and limited 2025 Dallas sample; listed behind Chris Bell on the Week 1 depth chart
RB · Change-of-pace back
8 carries · 2 targets
37 rush yds · 1.4 rec · 10 rec yds
2025 reserve usage behind Achane with room for a modest increase
TE · Primary receiving tight end
5 targets
3.0 rec · 38 rec yds
335 yards in nine 2025 games and the clearest veteran TE role
RB · Short-yardage back
7 carries · 1 target
28 rush yds · 0.8 rec · 6 rec yds
2025 depth usage with touchdown-dependent weekly value
WR · Rookie size target
4 targets
2.2 rec · 30 rec yds
First-team listing on the issued chart; no NFL regular-season baseline yet
TE · Rookie inline tight end
3 targets
1.5 rec · 16 rec yds
Projected rotational role; no NFL regular-season baseline yet
The model converts expected passing, rushing, and receiving stat lines with the same scoring formula used by the historical table. Its baseline is nflverse 2025 player stats plus Miami's 2026 roster roles.
Matchup adjustment: Neutral until the 2026 opponent sample is meaningful. The bands widen for new roles, small samples, and rookies. These are hand-curated opportunity estimates, not calibrated probability intervals, sportsbook lines or official rankings. Confidence describes the evidence for a role, not the chance of landing inside the range.
Explainable output
Generated from the projection inputs above—no hidden AI opinion or proprietary ranking feed.
Model leader
17.9 projected Half-PPR points with a 10.4–26.5 scenario range. His expected rushing production raises the floor beyond the passing line.
Built-in floor
5.7 of his point estimate comes from expected rushing production. That dual-threat layer matters while Miami's rebuilt receiving hierarchy settles.
Reception edge
4.2 projected catches add 2.1 points versus Standard scoring. Malik Willis remains the widest-range Miami option this week.
Franchise archive
Curated notable seasons; positional finishes are approximate where shown.
Showing 80 of 80
| Dan Marino | 1984 | QB | 360.7 | 22.5 | 16 | QB1 | 1980s |
| Dan Marino | 1985 | QB | 241.1 | 15.1 | 16 | QB2 | 1980s |
| Dan Marino | 1986 | QB | 319.5 | 20.0 | 16 | QB1 | 1980s |
| Dan Marino | 1988 | QB | 241.7 | 15.1 | 16 | QB3 | 1980s |
| Dan Marino | 1992 | QB | 235.2 | 14.7 | 16 | QB4 | 1990s |
| Dan Marino | 1994 | QB | 269.5 | 16.8 | 16 | QB2 | 1990s |
| Dan Marino | 1995 | QB | 214.1 | 15.3 | 14 | QB6 | 1990s |
| Bob Griese | 1971 | QB | 149.8 | 10.7 | 14 | — | 1970s |
| Bob Griese | 1977 | QB | 155.1 | 11.1 | 14 | — | 1970s |
| Tua Tagovailoa | 2022 | QB | 232.9 | 17.9 | 13 | QB13 | 2020s |
| Tua Tagovailoa | 2023 | QB | 280.4 | 16.5 | 17 | QB8 | 2020s |
| Tua Tagovailoa | 2024 | QB | 180.1 | 16.4 | 11 | QB22 | 2020s |
| Tua Tagovailoa | 2025 | QB | 160.5 | 11.5 | 14 | QB24 | 2020s |
| Ryan Tannehill | 2014 | QB | 282.9 | 17.7 | 16 | QB8 | 2010s |
| Ryan Tannehill | 2015 | QB | 260.4 | 16.3 | 16 | QB13 | 2010s |
Half-PPR scoring — top 10 in dataset
Positional rank — lower is better. Big gaps to the left of ADP were league-winners.
Half-PPR scoring — the positional ceiling each era produced (within dataset)